I created one of the campaign election videos for Labour, and Jeremy Corbyn,
This is a new version of Emeli Sande, Hope "You Are Not Alone
You can see the video here.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P5o8hRHh9IY
causeing stress is part of the new gov way to get rid of usjamie1965 said:I keep thinking do they think I’m gonna get better in 2021 wow that would be a date to look forward to instead I’m watching the days go by worrying who thought it would be a good idea to cause stress for people with illness
poppy123456 I lost my PIP award in January . My assessor stated review again in 8 years . I am 64 now so in 8 years I will be unable to apply for PIP in any case . Also my award stopped the exact date that was the decision letter was written , No further payment was received . Have requested an MR . still awaiting reply. Previously on DLA and then transferred successfully to Pip awarded for 4 years should have run until June 2018.
This is so wrong. How is this even legal! So in effect you could lose about eight months of money that was originally given to you, because they start the process a year before.poppy123456 said:Reviews are done 1 year before the award is due to end. If the decision goes in your favour, you'll have a new award date. If a decision doesn't go in your favour then your payments will stop 4 weeks after the decision is made, regardless of when your award was until.
I know that the DWP say a light touch review after a 10 year period I may be over thinking but what does a (light touch) really means.
I know it may be to early to ask this but I’ve found this article regarding (light touch) I may be over thinking this is what it really is?
Expedited or light touch review
The ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) has guidance on provision for expedited or light touch review.
Expedited review refers to the need for a proposal that involves possible risk of harm to have full ethics review, but for the review to be conducted quickly, and at short notice.
Light touch review can apply when the risk of substantive harm – to participants or to anyone else who could be affected by the research – is judged to be minimal. As with expedited review, the intent is that the review process should be quicker than if full review is necessary – the distinction is that with light touch review, a lower level of scrutiny may be necessary.
Some research ethics committees already make provision for expedited or light touch review – and the guidance in the ESRC FRE implies that these options may become more common in institutional research ethics committees that were set up to meet Research Council requirements for ethics review.
If you think your research might need expedited review, or might be eligible for light touch review, check whether the ethics committee that you are applying to offers these options. If they do not, you will have to submit an application for full review. If you can apply for expedited or light touch review, read the guidance in this section of the website.
For more information, see:
Expedited review
Light touch review full info regarding the above